Flora D. Floris, Willy A. Renandya, Wiwiet E. Savitri
This qualitative study explores how students perceive AI-generated feedback in research proposal writing, an area that has not been widely studied yet. Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a framework, the research investigates students' views on the usefulness, ease of use, attitude and intention to continue using AI-generated feedback. Data were gathered from 25 third-year English-major students at university who used the AI tool Brisk Teaching to get feedback on their research proposals. The findings revealed that students viewed the feedback as clear, thorough, and effective in not only correcting the surface errors but also in bringing up deeper issues such as the clarity of the argument. It appears that the majority of students agreed to continue using AI-generated feedback. Future extensions of the model should include ethical concerns, as students might raise doubts about the compatibility of the AI feedback with the academic values. © 2026, Chulalongkorn University Language Institute. All rights reserved.
Petra Christian University, Surabaya, Indonesia; Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
